That wash has substantially higher frame rates and lower processing requirements for the DLSS side, since the traditional GPU grunt work is not only pixel-bound but also texture-bound. Side-by-side comparisons of lower-res DLSS and higher-res TAA show strengths and weaknesses, but as of 2021, it's become a wash. While DLSS's initial launch left a few things to be desired, the system has matured to a point where moving 3D images with DLSS processing generally looks better than their higher-resolution, temporal anti-aliasing (TAA) counterparts. The shape of diagonal lines, the leaves on swaying tree branches, and even the letters and words on a street sign are all arguably easier to predict-at least when fueled by a lower-pixel base-than a StarCraft player's reaction to a Zerg rush. This works in part because DLSS is focused on a relatively nonvolatile prediction scenario: what a lower-resolution image would look like if it had more pixel depth. The idea being, RTX cards come with a slab of "tensor cores" baked onto the silicon, and these are dedicated to the mathematical grunt work of tasks like image interpretation and translation. No extra CPU, RAM, or other peripherals required. As a consumer-grade offering, DLSS requires Nvidia's "RTX" graphics cards that ( theoretically) cost as little as $329-and nothing else. Making smoother gaming-arguably easier than Tom Cruise’s faceīut those tests are usually run with a supercomputer managing those troves of data. Nvidia has a much bigger plan for the future of average users' computing than they've publicly let on. Since that report went live, I've done some thinking, and I can't shake a certain feeling. Nvidia, Nintendo's exclusive SoC provider for existing Switch models, will remain on board for this refreshed model, Bloomberg said, and that contribution will include the tantalizing, Nvidia-exclusive "upscaling" technology known as Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS). What made the report so interesting was that it had a technical answer to that seemingly impossible rendering challenge. but jumping all the way to 4K resolution would need a massive bump from the 2016 system's current specs. The latest report on Tuesday teased a vague bump in specs like clock speed and memory, which could make the Switch run better. Aurich Lawson / Ars Technica reader comments 89 withĮarlier this week, Bloomberg Japan's report on a rumored Nintendo Switch "Pro" version exploded with a heavy-duty allegation: all those rumors about a "4K" Switch might indeed be true after all.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |